{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Baker &amp; Associates Blog","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.bakerslaw.com\/blogs\/8183","author_name":"doadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.bakerslaw.com\/blogs\/8183\/author\/doadmin\/","title":"Proposed ELD Delay Rejected By California House","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iFRPPfntHZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bakerslaw.com\/blogs\/8183\/proposed-eld-delay-rejected-by-california-house\/\">PROPOSED ELD DELAY REJECTED BY CALIFORNIA HOUSE<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bakerslaw.com\/blogs\/8183\/proposed-eld-delay-rejected-by-california-house\/embed\/#?secret=iFRPPfntHZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;PROPOSED ELD DELAY REJECTED BY CALIFORNIA HOUSE&#8221; &#8212; Baker &amp; Associates Blog\" data-secret=\"iFRPPfntHZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.bakerslaw.com\/blogs\/8183\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"In a recent post (read in full here), we discussed proposed Federal legislation that would affect California commercial transportation companies by extending the deadline to comply with an electronic logging device (\"ELD\") mandate. The amendment to delay compliance until 2018 was rejected in a House vote last week. In other words, instead of having until September 2018"}